Percona vs mysql community

Oracle vs MySQL benchmark test - Percona. MariaDB is feature rich balanced with performance. Percona is a performance version of MySQL , and tends to stay forked with MySQL , streamlined on performance.

When MySQL was acquired by Sun and then Oracle, groups left to start their own forks of the MySQL code. Both are built to be drop-in replacements of MySQL. Applications that work with MySQL should also work with either of these forks.

Percona Server is a fork of MySQL that came into being about years ago. They care about InnoDB performance so much that they inject 30lines of code into its version of MySQL to make those enhancements possible. Welcome to the Percona community ! Solve problems, share knowledge and engage with experts of all levels on all things MySQL , MongoDB and other open source topics. The Database Performance Blog is the place to read highly technical posts from Percona experts. Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

What are the advantages of MySQL in comparison to Oracle? What is the MySQL Workbench equivalent for MariaDB? It is a free, fully compatible, enhance open source drop-in replacement for MySQL that provides superior performance, scalability and instrumentation. Percona executes queries in parallel – MySQL doesn’t When MySQL uses MyISAM storage engine and executes a query, it locks all the tables needed by that query, so that data is not modified by other queries.

This blog post is our attempt to summarize the key features that differentiate the three MySQL “flavours”. We also try to give you suggestions as to which flavour may be the best for a given type of project. Percona is fine as well and will not require your dev team to redevelop anything should you choose to use it. But there are a hell of a lot more mysql instances then there are of percona instances.

You want mysql support? The Percona employees are mostly former MySQL people. The top reviewer of MySQL writes Easy to use with a straightforward setup but requires better replication.

Our server company advised we switch to Percona when setting up our new DB servers. Keys used for encryption are stored in files (which is not compliant with regulations - keys should be stored in a vault - something which MySQL Enterprise supports). Percona actually says their support excludes MySQL Workbench on their website: Percona MySQL Support excludes coverage for: The NDB Cluster database and storage engine (available as a separate option) All graphical tools, such as MySQL Workbench.

Navicat does support it, and has modeling features like MySQL Workbench. Are they syntactically similar? Where do these two languages differ? Why would I use one over the other?

Oracle: The license of the MySQL Server itself. Only MySQL Enterprise Edition has the Enterprise plug-ins (Thread Pool, PAM, Audit, etc.) Certifications and Indemnification support for the MySQL Enterprise Server. The MySQL Community Server statically. For example, Percona 5. It supports rollup in specific interval automatically after creating the database. Percona also offers a set of Opensource MySQL tools as part of their MySQL toolkit which is very handy for the DBAs to help with their daily administration activities.

Another area that Percona MySQL stands out is bringing enterprise features into their fully open-source MySQL version. An Overview of the Different MySQL Replication Solutions. This is a new concept introduced in the MySQL Community Edition 5. Simply the Percona XtraDB Cluster is MySQL 5.